nursemommyapcs9so nursemommyapcs9so
  • 01-08-2018
  • History
contestada

how was congress handicapped because of the following court cases: Hammer v. Dagenhart(1918) and Bailey v Drexel Furniture Co (1922).

Respuesta :

DukeMoseti
DukeMoseti DukeMoseti
  • 15-08-2018

Congress was handicapped as its legislation was deemed as unconstitutional exercise of power. In Hammer v. Dagenhart, the Supreme Court held that the law passed by Congress in 1916 was an inappropriate exercise of constitutional power granted by the commerce clause while in Bailey v. Drexel, the law was found to be in unconstitutional exercise of taxing power

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

3 bullets points of Antietam information about the battle
if x+1/x = 2 then x^3 + 1/x^3
Monochromatic light of wavelength lambda, such as light from a laser, is directed through two narrow parallel slits that are a distance d apart. There is a view
hi im new here ummm and yes dont report my question
A train leaves San Diego at 1:00 pm. A second train leaves the same city in the same direction at 3:00 pm. The second train travels 30 mph faster then the first
I am the system of government that bans private property
How does the following portion of Susan B. Anthony's speech support her argument? The preamble of the Federal Constitution says: We, the people of the United St
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP :) im to lazy to do these
The question is in the picture.
A chlorine atom becomes stable by having 8 valence electrons by A losing one electron B gaining one electron C gaining 3 electrons D losing seven electrons