sariyawashere
sariyawashere sariyawashere
  • 04-06-2020
  • Social Studies
contestada

Question:
According to the Supreme Court, is the Indian Removal Act constitutional or
unconstitutional? What is their reasoning?​

Respuesta :

sindlea
sindlea sindlea
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:

It was unconstitutional because traditionally, no tribal government or chief held authority over all the Cherokees. But in 1721, South Carolina colonists succeeded in persuading the Cherokees to choose a principal chief for the entire tribe to negotiate selling some of its hunting grounds.

Answer Link
kassidyjenna2014 kassidyjenna2014
  • 04-06-2020

Answer:unconstitutional

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Briefly describe the major milestones in the history of fireworks, including when and how they were first developed and how they have transformed over the years
describe your village in French to English​
such as water or oxygen, All of the matter in a what is the same?
Committees that consider a proposed bill have the authority to
50(60w-30)=50w+350find the value of w​
Texto argumentativo sobre la independencia del Peru en el 1821 teniendo en cuenta la siguiente estructura:tesis cuerpo y conclucion
A sprinter travels a distance of 200 m in a time of 20.03 seconds. What is the sprinter's average speed rounded to 4 sf?
Blazing new trails and moving west was very A. easy B. difficult C. uncommon​
Choose an organism. Use credible websites to research the classification of that organism and the characteristics its shares with other organisms you selected a
If I take a 7 question multiple choice test, with 4 choices per question, what is the probability that I get 1 wrong